Image Source: A Peace for Nature
Senedd Home was mothballed for five long years because of a lack of support. Don’t let it happen again. This site doesn’t receive any public funding or subsidy. If you believe I’m trying something new here or like what’s being done, consider a donation. Â One-off or monthly; as little or as much as you want.
Click the links below, or full details are available here.
River Water Quality & Sewage Discharges
Is this devolved to Wales?

Devolved
The necessary powers are not reserved to the UK Parliament in Schedule 7A of the Government of Wales Act 2006.

Shared Powers
Insert a specific explanation of the powers situation for this issue here.

Not Devolved
The powers over this are reserved to the UK Parliament in Schedule 7A of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (Specific Section/Number/Clause).
There have been growing concerns over about the number and frequency of sewage discharges into Welsh rivers and seas by water companies.
In 2024, only 40% of Welsh water bodies were deemed to have at least “good” water quality1. This falls to 22% for estuaries and coastal areas. 92 rivers were deemed to have “poor” or “bad” water quality.
On 24th June 2026, the Senedd failed to agree on a single way forward, simultaneously rejecting (non-binding) calls for: a Welsh Rivers Act (Reform UK), devolution of more water powers (Plaid Cymru), better enforcement (Labour) and the abolition of Natural Resources Wales (Conservatives).
Most sewage discharges have been blamed on storm overflows. High levels of surface runoff during heavy rain led to sewage being released from treatment works into the sea or rivers to prevent the system being overwhelmed.
Such discharges need a permit from Natural Resources Wales. There are around 2,100 such permitted overflows in Wales.
To a certain degree, sewage discharges have always happened. Though campaigners argue that water companies are using storm overflows as an excuse.
However, the number of incidents has spiked since 2020. Discharge rules were relaxed by the UK Government to address chemical supply chain issues caused by Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic.
This has been made worse by a lack of investment in sewerage infrastructure by water companies – both before and since privatisation.
A separate issue affecting river quality is nitrate runoff from farms (usually from fertilisers, slurry and muck-spreading).
The previous Welsh Government’s approach to this has been controversial, having designated the whole of Wales a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ), which the then opposition parties – including Plaid Cymru – considered to be a blunt tool.
Aside from the environment more generally, potentially anyone who goes near (or lives near) an affected river or water body.
Several popular and well-known beaches have lost their blue flag status in recent years because of concerns over water quality.Â
Number of permitted storm overflows; Dwr Cymru and Hafren Dyfrdwy (Natural Resources Wales)
Percentage of permitted storm overflows that have spilled; Dwr Cymru and Hafren Dyfrdwy (during 2024, Natural Resources Wales)
Costs & Economic Impact
Storm overflows-
Costs estimated in a 2023 report to the Welsh Government.
-
This would potentially add anything between £60-390 to water bills in Wales.
Who has raised this at the Senedd?
What are the party positions on this?
- Supports stronger regulation
- Opposed
- Neutral/No Opinion
Plaid Cymru supports tougher regulation of the water industry and support a new system of regulation in Wales. They support full devolution of water powers.
- Supports stronger regulation
- Opposed
- Neutral/No Opinion
Reform UK proposed a Welsh River Act and believe Natural Resources Wales hasn’t been resourced properly to fulfill its broad brief. They oppose further devolution of water powers to Wales.
- Supports stronger regulation
- Opposed
- Neutral/No Opinion
Labour supports the creation of a Welsh water regulator and tougher enforcement.
- Supports
- Wants a new regulator
- Neutral/No Opinion
The Conservatives have been heavily critical of Natural Resources Wales’ role in failing to properly regulate water quality. They have called for its abolition and replacement with a new environmental regulator.
- Supports stronger regulation
- Opposed
- Neutral/No Opinion
The Greens support nationalisation of water, and have condemned the current regulations as being not fit for purpose.
- Supports stronger regulation
- Opposed
- Neutral/No Opinion
Jane Dodds expressed support for stronger regulation and monitoring, but believes the increase in river pollution can be linked to Brexit and withdrawing from higher EU standards.
What have ministers said?
What's being done about this?
Plaid Cymru’s manifesto supported the previous Welsh Government’s plans to introduce a water regulator for Wales. They have included a law on this in their legislative programme.
The Welsh Government also seeks full devolution of water to Wales (at the moment only parts of it are devolved – such as sewerage).
The Minister has said that he expects “(water) companies to subject to clearer expectations, stronger performance oversight and more direct consequences when they fail to meet standards. This includes the ability to set price controls for Wales.”
The Minister has also announced what he described as a “science-led” approach to nitrate runoffs from farms. He has hinted at lifting a ban on muck-spreading during winter months.
A law will be needed to establish a new water regulator for Wales once the necessary powers are devolved. This was included in the Welsh Government’s legislative programme announcement.
A water regulation law was included as part of the first phase of the Welsh Government’s legislative programme, meaning it could be introduced during 2027.
What have the Senedd's Committees said?
Nothing has been discussed yet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit.
Quisque faucibus ex sapien vitae pellentesque sem placerat.
In id cursus mi pretium tellus duis convallis.
Tempus leo eu aenean sed diam urna tempor.
Pulvinar vivamus fringilla lacus nec metus bibendum egestas. Iaculis massa nisl malesuada lacinia integer nunc posuere. Ut hendrerit semper vel class aptent taciti sociosqu.
Ad litora torquent per conubia nostra inceptos himenaeos.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque faucibus ex sapien vitae pellentesque sem placerat. In id cursus mi pretium tellus duis convallis.
Relevant Votes
| Date | Motion Number | Subject | Tabled As | Binding Vote? | Votes For | Abstentions | Votes Against | Absent/No Vote | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24/06/26 | NDM9259 | Amendment – Scrap Natural Resources Wales | No | 36 | 0 | 50 | 8 | REJECTED | |
| 24/06/26 | NDM9259 | Amendment – Better enforcement & more resources | No | 11 | 0 | 75 | 8 | REJECTED | |
| 24/06/26 | NDM9259 | Amendment – Devolve water powers | No | 40 | 1 | 45 | 8 | REJECTED | |
| 24/06/26 | NDM9259 | Support a Welsh Rivers Act | No | 37 | 0 | 49 | 8 | REJECTED |
Further Reading
- Natural Resources Wales. “Assessment of water quality in Wales, 2024“
- Stantec (September 2023). “An investigation into the costs and benefits ofdifferent storm overflow control policies for Wales“
- Senedd Research Service (16th December 2024). “Nitrate pollution in Wales: what’s the situation now?“




